Link to Audio Source Case: Retribution ought not be a consideration in determining punishment in the criminal justice system. Government: Harvard ST PM: Alexander Schwab MG: Georgios Theophanous Opposition: Hopkins MB LO: Jon Bateman MO: Michael Mayernick [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]Unknown won.[/expand]
“Link to Audio Source Case: Should there be statutes of limitations? Opp chose to abolish them. Government: Cornell A PM: Adam Bonnifield MG: Nick Stone Opposition: Yale A LO: Rory Gillis MO: Adam Chilton [expand title=””Results”” notitle=””true”” trigclass=””arrowright””]Unknown won.[/expand] “
Case: Should states have bad samaritan laws? Opp said yes. Government: Princeton A PM: Dan Greco MG: Kate Reilly Opposition: Strawmen OTY LO: Robert Glunt MO: Robbie Pratt [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]Strawmen OTY won.[/expand] Thanks to Robert Glunt, for filming and donating this recording. Alex Amar for recovering this video. Mirror Link
Case: Juror nullification should be allowed as a legal defense, and defendants ought be allowed to explicitly argue that the jury should nullify. Government: NYU B PM: Neil Vakharia MG: Kate Sawyer Opposition: Yale CW LO: Jay Cox MO: Tim Willenken [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]Yale CW won.[/expand]
Note: This recording is in two parts. Case: In the criminal law, should ignorance of the law be a deciding factor in a defendant’s culpability? Opp said, “No.” Government: Hopkins MB PM: Michael Mayernick MG: Jon Bateman Opposition: W&M A LO: Chris Ford MO: Robbie Pratt [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]Unknown won.[/expand]
