Case: Should prisoners on death row be eligible for organ transplants? Opp said no. Government: MIT FG PM: Adam Groce MG: Linda Fang Opposition: Brown / Smith Hybrid LO: Trevor Gleason MO: Lily Lamboy [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]MIT FG won.[/expand] Thanks to Adam Goldstein, for filming and donating this recording. Mirror Link
Category: Videos
Swarthmore 2005 Semifinals: Princeton A v. Strawmen OTY
Case: Should states have bad samaritan laws? Opp said yes. Government: Princeton A PM: Dan Greco MG: Kate Reilly Opposition: Strawmen OTY LO: Robert Glunt MO: Robbie Pratt [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]Strawmen OTY won.[/expand] Thanks to Robert Glunt, for filming and donating this recording. Alex Amar for recovering this video. Mirror Link
Smith 2006 Semifinals: Wesleyan / Haverford FM v. Harvard BC
Case: Public sex education should teach about masturbation. Government: Wesleyan / Haverford FM PM: Chris Migliaccio MG: Amanda Fuller Opposition: Harvard BC LO: Zach Cafritz MO: Piotr Brezinski [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]Wesleyan / Haverford FM won.[/expand]
Smith 2003 Quarterfinals: NYU A v. Cornell GS
Case: As a single issue advocacy group, should you legislate through congress or litigate through court? (Opp chose legislate) Government: NYU A PM: Neil Vakharia MG: Amanda Entin Opposition: Cornell GS LO: Robert Glunt MO: David Schoonover [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]NYU A won.[/expand] Thanks to Robert Glunt, for filming and donating this recording.
Princeton 2005 Quarterfinals: Yale D v. Cornell A
Case: Legal immigrants with children in school should be allowed to vote in school board elections. Government: Yale D PM: Rory Gillis MG: Ariel Schneller Opposition: Cornell A LO: Robert Glunt MO: Justin Berkowitz [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]Cornell A won.[/expand] Thanks to Robert Glunt, for filming and donating this recording. Alex Amar for recovering the […]
NYU 2006 Finals: Hopkins MB v. Yale BG
Case: The Kyoto Protocol ought to be scrapped. Government: Hopkins MB PM: Michael Mayernick MG: Jon Bateman Opposition: Yale BG LO: Jed Glickstein MO: Josh Bone [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]Yale BG won.[/expand]
Nationals 2006 Round 3: Maryland A v. Harvard ST
“Case: You are a journalist in a quarantined city infected by the plague. Given the choice between leaving the city to return to your wife and staying and helping treat the infected, what should you do? Opp chose to leave. Government: Maryland A PM: Greg Arthur MG: Shauro Bagchi Opposition: Harvard ST LO: Georgios Theophanous […]
Nationals 2005 Finals: Harvard BP v. Cornell A
Case: Larry Summer’s comments in regards to the lack of women in math and science did not warrant a vote of no confidence. Government: Harvard BP PM: Alex Blenkinsopp MG: Alex Potapov Opposition: Cornell A LO: Robert Glunt MO: Adam Bonnifield [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]Harvard BP won.[/expand]
Nationals 2004 Finals: Cornell B v. Harvard RC
Case: Abolish the death penalty and punishment of life without parole. Government: Cornell B PM: Adam Bonnifield MG: Robert Glunt Opposition: Harvard RC LO: Marty Roth MO: Nico Cornell [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]Harvard RC won.[/expand] Thanks to Thanks to Adam Bonnifield for offering us a copy of the round.
Nationals 2003 Quarterfinals: NYU B v. Yale CW
Case: Juror nullification should be allowed as a legal defense, and defendants ought be allowed to explicitly argue that the jury should nullify. Government: NYU B PM: Neil Vakharia MG: Kate Sawyer Opposition: Yale CW LO: Jay Cox MO: Tim Willenken [expand title=”Results” notitle=”true” trigclass=”arrowright”]Yale CW won.[/expand]